i.e. the Jedi we see in the prequels have been under Yoda's continuous leadership for hundreds of years
-
-
in the RotS novelization it goes into detail abt Yoda realizing the failure of the Jedi/Republic is his
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @BootlegGirl
ok, so I actually think it matters whether or not yoda is the reform's architect bc the Jedi
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
policy of non-militarization requires griffyndor qualities to implement but not to maintain.
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Yoda's role as a cautious, admonishing mystical advisor is way more ravenclaw
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @cromage @BootlegGirl
Maybe. I see the essence of Ravenclaw as seeking to live up to external standards
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
RotS novelization does have a big moment be Yoda taking personal responsibility for losing the war
3 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @arthur_affect @BootlegGirl
a war he never wanted and couldn't actually lead but also couldn't bring himself to oppose
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @cromage @BootlegGirl
yeah, but the real issue is that the Jedi were fighting the wrong war in the first place
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
the Jedi were set up to ensure that an open political resurgence of Sith doctrine would be impossible
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes
but by creating such a totalizing monolithic political order they were breeding internal dissension
-
-
they created a political structure perfectly suited for a "new kind of Sith"
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
the Sith slowly corrupting existing political institutions instead of being an open death cult
0 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.