-
-
Replying to @FreyjaErlings
Correlation is not causation. But it is correlation.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FreyjaErlings @AndriErlingsson
the inclusion of the specific faction of religious social conservatives in the Right is enough to skew that stat
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect
I wonder if they'll make the data accessible, being able to include/exclude them might be interesting analysis to do
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FreyjaErlings @AndriErlingsson
I guess I'd also say the stodgy Traditional Right, your Frums and whatnot, aren't super religious but dislike swearing
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @AndriErlingsson
the point is yes someone who doesn't swear is more likely to be conservative bc not swearing is a conservative social norm
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @AndriErlingsson
but there's plenty of whole factions of the Right that are profane af
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @arthur_affect
See the alt-reich et al. What's interesting is the study that correlates swearing with honesty, which is weird
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FreyjaErlings @AndriErlingsson
prolly bc some liars are consciously shaping their language to be "nicer"
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @AndriErlingsson
the general "tell" of dishonesty is language that's more planned, more self-conscious
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
like on the flip side, accidentally swearing when you didn't mean to offend would strike me as a sign of sincere emotion
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.