this is why unless your numbers vastly outdo theirs you aren't supposed to totally surround enemies
-
-
"Unconditional surrender" was a novelty when the Allies came up with it in WWII
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @MxTolvo and
a war is supposed to end with a treaty, plausible terms of tribute, a "better luck next time"
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @arthur_affect @MxTolvo and
what we were asking from Japan in WWII was huge, society-shaking
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @MxTolvo and
and we only got it bc we had the Death Star
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect
Well,that's where the paper thin metaphor breaks, though. Everybody's got "death stars" now.
@arthur_affect@MxTolvo@superbranch2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BootlegGirl
Leaving aside the question of whether we have doomed the Earth via climate,
@arthur_affect@MxTolvo@superbranch1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BootlegGirl
I've always known we had the capacity to destroy the world. It's the surveillance I fear more.
@arthur_affect@MxTolvo@superbranch1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
oh yeah, killing EVERYONE is old hat. The new hotness in dread is killing ANYONE
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @BootlegGirl and
SWTOR has a new superweapon that's a Death Star with a very small laser
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
but one powerful enough to kill any one person instantly through any shielding, from orbit
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @BootlegGirl and
all they have to do is tag you with tracking nanites at some point
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect
So I wasn't sure if this was in the star wars canon thread or the real politics thread til I checked
@arthur_affect@MxTolvo@superbranch0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.