What's really upsetting is the idea a purer-than-thou vote for either candidate could give us President Trump.https://twitter.com/arthur_affect/status/777918735323656193 …
-
-
Replying to @gerryconway
@arthur_affect Mr. Conway, voting for Hillary is not a purer-than-thou vote?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ArambarriFelipe @arthur_affect
It's a vote reflecting judgment on relative merits of 2 candidates who actually have a chance to win.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gerryconway @arthur_affect
Ergo, there will never be a third option, even better. Awesome.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ArambarriFelipe @arthur_affect
No, there won't. Sorry if reality offends you.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gerryconway @arthur_affect
No, I sorry really for you (and USA). Choosing between two really bad candidates, and campaining for them, even
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ArambarriFelipe @arthur_affect
Well, usually it means we avoid the horror of far-right neo-Nazi parties like those in Europe.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gerryconway @arthur_affect
Libertarian party is a nazi party?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ArambarriFelipe @arthur_affect
Did I say that? No. I pointed out the usual benefit of a two-party system is to prevent fringe candidates.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
untag pls
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.