Since y'all won't shut up about Supernatural, I'm starting it. You are accountable if it fails to measure up. All of you. Especially YOU.
-
-
Replying to @Lollardfish @realsesmith
it is much less deep/good than Buffy/Angel but way more fandom-ish even though those shows invented fandom
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
v broad character archetypes, deeply incestuous relationship web, lots of quipping and expositing abt feelings
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
effects somehow less convincing than Buffy/Angel despite being several generations ahead
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
(it's the lazy CG thing, anything that can be CG is)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Lollardfish
I'm sensing a lot of manfeels in my future.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
the show hates women but admittedly a huge chunk of its female fanbase hates women characters
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
DEATH TO THE HET CANON SHIP and so forth
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Lollardfish
I'm also, uhm, intrigued by the prominent role of incest in the fandom?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
yeah at some point this got normalized don't ask me
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Harry Potter fans saw pairing Fred/George as a troll/extreme thing to do, now Sam/Dean is mainstream
-
-
I will say one of last seasons eps was one of the best hours of TV I've watched
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
and its being so is 100% contingent on being a fan, it's meaningless unless you've watched the show for years
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.