But it somewhat undermines the "harassment is not a problem, elites use harassment to shut up the small fry"
-
-
Replying to @nberlat
when we have an example of someone with a large platform and major media ins (that would be Michael)
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @nberlat
shamelessly slandering someone he happens not to like on the basis of baseless innuendo.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @nberlat
It's really irresponsible, and exactly the sort of thing that leads to demonizing ppl, paving the way for dogpiling and abuse.
2 replies 2 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @nberlat
the fact that Michael refers to those Chu blocks as his "victims" is particularly preposterous.
1 reply 1 retweet 11 likes -
Replying to @nberlat
I don't know why Michael felt he had to have a villain to denounce in order to make his points about free speech.
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @nberlat
it's a really crappy way to frame the argument though, and undermines a presumption of good faith.
3 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @nberlat
imo, his own examples undercut the argument so much it actually does a disservice to other people's critiques of "tech overlords."
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @SaddestRobots @nberlat
"All these people come to me and say they've been blocked without ever interacting with him" sounds a lot like…
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @SaddestRobots @nberlat
"He Block-Chained me to get rid of my followers annoying him, and now they complain about it to me."
3 replies 1 retweet 5 likes
boy my random thoughts must be incredibly valuable if being denied them counts as being "victimized"
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.