2) If Suey were primarily motivated by money/prestige she'd never have done (bad) shit like burning bridges w 18MR over the NYAS campaign
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect
Which was motivated AFAICT by fear of accusations of selling out/inauthenticity by ppl like Nair tbh
1 reply 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @arthur_affect
3) this piece seems researched 100% from online sources w no primary interviews w ppl who know the ppl involved
1 reply 2 retweets 7 likes -
-
Replying to @arthur_affect
4) BS like claiming she can't be sure if a racist parody account is really Suey or not tells me all I need to know abt the author
1 reply 2 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect
If I had to say what was Wrong With Online Activism I'd say it's the constant ratcheting pressure to be more pure, more woke, less corrupt
3 replies 10 retweets 29 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect
Anyway my take is that Nair is 180 degrees wrong and Suey got into the shit she did bc she *wasnt* particularly into managing her brand
1 reply 3 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect
People don't become viral targets bc they carefully brand manage, they do so bc they talk to a clique of friends & lose perspective
2 replies 7 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect
But of course the shortcut to dehumanizing someone and justifying attacks on them is characterizing them as venal/mercenary
2 replies 5 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect
"Hey I think that's an old address in the dox" w00t so some poor sap who lives there now gets harassed instead, that's even better
1 reply 4 retweets 16 likes
You know like the MULTIPLE TIMES ppl getting swatted bc they lived in a target's old address made the news last year
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.