@arthur_affect It also completely ignores the possibility of indirect harm, which is both harder to see and much farther-reaching.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@arthur_affect indirect harm is a problem too but you know, fuck it, right?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@arthur_affect tho they complicate the hell out of it when it's time to argue that taxes are more coercive than stop-and-frisking minoritiesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@arthur_affect I'll take their definition of direct harm in good faith and say "it's still wrong to contribute to indirectly harming folks." -
@arthur_affect Not that I feel like it is in good faith, but even if it was - bare minimum of "don't be evil" isn't "be good." - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@un_ouragan
@arthur_affect ugh actual libertarians are the fucking worstThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@arthur_affect "I am paying this person to punch you. However, as I am not doing the punching, I am not harming you."Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.