Ye: It's a weird one not based on Followers. I've seen barely known folk with tick who are basically RSS feeds.https://twitter.com/sblomkamp/status/666702123048964096 …
-
-
@arthur_affect@tauriqmoosa Almost no one from Scientific American has verification, so it isn't based on being considered media. -
@FlyingTrilobite@tauriqmoosa Yep, SciAm isn't based in the Bay Area and doesn't have a social media editor who knows someone at Twitter
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@arthur_affect@tauriqmoosa the man speaks true. I've seen accounts with 500 followers who are utter randos but they are close to TwitterThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.