Even more of it comes from trying to fit wide swathes of literature into a unified canon governed by the same rules. (E.g., act structures.)
-
-
Replying to @AlexandraErin
So many of us spend so much time trying to stretch prose stories out onto a framework that made sense for *plays*.
1 reply 5 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @AlexandraErin
Or pruning our voice out of a story until it's nothing but a set of bullet points with dialogue.
1 reply 3 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @AlexandraErin
Or trying to figure out a way to center a story that's not about conflict around a conflict, because reasons.
1 reply 4 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AlexandraErin
Also, the reason I named Palahniuk, King, and Clancy? Is because they're among the writers whose advice I see touted most often.
4 replies 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AlexandraErin
@alexandraerin Their advice tends to revolve around "Strip away, strip away" which is popular advice1 reply 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect
@arthur_affect More so Tom and Chuck than Steve, but yeah.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AlexandraErin
@alexandraerin The standard creative-writing course "strip away" logic straight up states Dickens is a bad incompetent writer4 replies 6 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect
@arthur_affect Dickens, Poe, Shakespeare, Dumas...2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AlexandraErin
@alexandraerin@arthur_affect Strip away everything and you're left with little flavour and a very short book.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@lilylayer4 @alexandraerin "Stripped away" = "better"/"artsier" is how we get Ryan Adams' 1989
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.