@arthur_affect I was pretty sure it was you, trying to prove your point about Section 230.
-
-
-
I FUCKING KNOW RIGHT
@alexandraerin@arthur_affect - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@arthur_affect Hopefully they are making some kind of larger point about... something. But I'll believe it when they say so themselves.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@TooBrokeToFail@arthur_affect@alexandraerin Firstly, Paul v. Davis voted against that right. Secondly, he was suing the actual libellers.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@TooBrokeToFail@arthur_affect@alexandraerin You shifted the goalposts that quickly, huh? Please show how it destroys that trust.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@TooBrokeToFail@arthur_affect@alexandraerin Does it? Please show the part of the legslation that does that. Thats quite an expansive claimThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@TooBrokeToFail@arthur_affect@alexandraerin And you've completely left the harassment issue behind, which was the point of the article.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@TooBrokeToFail@arthur_affect@alexandraerin Again, you haven't backed up anything you said, including your false claim cda prevents suitsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@TooBrokeToFail@arthur_affect@alexandraerin for false advertisements.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@TooBrokeToFail@arthur_affect@alexandraerin Arthurs' article about the legislation was because he cares about harasssment.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.