@arthur_affect @benjanun_s yeah, I saw that too
-
-
Replying to @spidey_j
@spidey_j@benjanun_s I mean arguing for the "soft" def of "dox" is a huge GG talking point you realize1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @arthur_affect
@arthur_affect@spidey_j@benjanun_s It is also a big anti-abuse talking point. eg: http://crashoverridenetwork.tumblr.com/post/114270394687/so-youve-been-doxed-a-guide-to-best-practices …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sschinke
@sschinke@arthur_affect@benjanun_s well, I was going to say that's why the CON definition is good because it speaks to goals3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @spidey_j
@spidey_j@sschinke@benjanun_s I'd call it doxing when coffeeandink got "soft"-doxed during RaceFail '09 for instance1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @arthur_affect
@arthur_affect@sschinke@benjanun_s and while I think the inequality in consequences matters, playing w definitions doesn't help w that imo2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @spidey_j
@spidey_j@sschinke@benjanun_s I mean it's a continuum, every new piece of information leads to another1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @arthur_affect
@arthur_affect@sschinke@benjanun_s I've also moved away from thinking some targets are okay so I'm less in favor of violentacrez exposure1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @spidey_j
@arthur_affect@sschinke@benjanun_s than I used to be2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @spidey_j
@arthur_affect@sschinke@benjanun_s a lot of this stuff is because we're compensating for platforms/law not protecting us4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
@spidey_j @sschinke @benjanun_s I really feel like Adrian Chen saw the latter as a price to pay for the former
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.