@JonathanDBrown Ok. The author of that article should've said that - he dodges it
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@JonathanDBrown That's my whole point. If you WOULD have said "Ich bin Der Sturmer" if Der Sturmer had got murdered that's consistentThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@JonathanDBrown Arguing "Was CH like Der Sturmer?" makes it about contentThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@JonathanDBrown What does that have to do with freedom of speechThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@JonathanDBrown You can't make both arguments at once, the arg over absolute freedom of speech and the one over contentThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@JonathanDBrown If the content is irrelevant bc they were murdered and no one deserves to be murdered, then stand by thatThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@JonathanDBrown If the content matters then the content is open to be debatedThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@JonathanDBrown Ok. And so defenses of CH are irrelevant bc you'd do the same for Der SturmerThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@JonathanDBrown If you would exercise the right to "caveats" at an Ich Bin Der Sturmer rally, though, then ppl can have caveats hereThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.