Okay so leaving aside all the philosophical stuff, the GCs in the comments "defending" this article are actually attacking it The article says "If pregnancy were seen as something that affected men, we'd have better obstetric care" The comments are saying the exact oppositehttps://twitter.com/LaborProject/status/1383879008899670028 …
-
-
But hot-take "What if men..." articles can't really articulate that If you actually unpack it to say "What if people treated people who got pregnant as though they were men?" you run headlong into the "trans issue" you were trying to avoid
-
It really comes down to what affects lawmakers personally, and those law makers are overwhelmingly white cis men. The answer to solving that isn't "what if men" but rather "what if lawmakers were composed in such a way to truly reflect the diversity of society".
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.