This is what “just asking questions” leads to. This is what signing up to defend the “free speech” of hateful bigots involves you in. This is what the people you’re defending actually want to do. They aren’t going to stop at whatever genteel form of transphobic policy you prefer.https://twitter.com/chasestrangio/status/1381641701245194244 …
-
-
Researchers get very upset when this happens and then frequently try to lie that it didn't happen, which is where so many of the hilariously bad studies in anthropology come from But it's no one's responsibility but yours to build trust with the people you would study
-
(See, for example, Puerto Rican independence supporters openly campaigning to abstain from any PR statehood referendum, so it will be publicly known the results will be statistically invalid and illegitimate)
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
once I had blockers and was being pushed into my mandatory therapy afterwards I figured there was nothing for it except to filibuster Devita Singh
-
(she of later “88% desistance” fame)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I totally approve of your right to try to fuck with data you think is immoral. However, on the flipside, I also believe the there is no such thing as forbidden knowledge. If you can know it, do so, because knowledge is truth and power at the same time, and that's rad af
-
i get where you’re coming from but i think instead of “forbidden knowledge” a better way to frame it is “knowledge that is none of my business.” like knowledge that belongs to a community you aren’t part of, you don’t have the *right* to gain that knowledge even if you *can*
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.