(Yes, I know that the super-soldier serum isn't technically the same thing as the heart-shaped herb But saying that Zemo's whole argument specifically applies only to the weaknesses of Erskine's formula is the kind of tedious argument that people make fun of comic books for)
-
Show this thread
-
(FYI Ryan Coogler doesn't care that much about this distinction and in the commentary for Black Panther freely refers to T'Challa's powers as making him a "super-soldier")
1 reply 2 retweets 46 likesShow this thread -
But then you could make this point in general about the MCU being "one continuity" being problematic and how movies don't talk about other movies as much as they logically should Isn't the Hulk a way, way, WAY more salient argument about the dangers of superhumans than Karli
6 replies 7 retweets 68 likesShow this thread -
Hell it should be the only thing anyone talks about AT ALL with this argument It's the big green elephant in the room "Yeah Bruce Banner injected himself because everyone thought he was this gentle softboi nerd Now the city of Lagos is a pile of rubble"
2 replies 4 retweets 53 likesShow this thread -
(The fact that the rejoinder to this argument is "Well just don't use the gamma rays, then, stupid! It was the gamma rays that were the problem!" is why comic books are dumb and people who care about them, like myself, are dumb)
7 replies 2 retweets 63 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @arthur_affect
I mean, if he could kill the Hulk, I’m sure he would. Karli is worth paying attention to bc she was trying to make more super soldiers.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @CounselorNachos
The fact that Bruce "cured" himself and Professor Hulk seems like a decent trustworthy dude is another counterexample to Zemo's whole argument But one that opens up this gigantic can of worms about how all of Bruce's character development has had to be offscreen and handwavy
2 replies 5 retweets 24 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @CounselorNachos
It's because he hasnt had his own movie in over a decade
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Is there any reason why? Or did both the prior Hulk movies (Bana and Norton) do bad, and scare the producers away from trying another with the current actor?
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @jlindy77 @DonCoyote and
For a long while, Universal owned the rights to him. I believe that's cleared up though.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Nah the Universal situation is still ongoing But Universal only ever had the *distribution* rights to Hulk *movies*, which is why Marvel could just freely put Hulk in other movies where he wasn't the main character
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @uneek35 and
The big news about putting all kinds of Hulk stuff back into the MCU with She-Hulk is just because of Disney+ letting Marvel pivot to big-budget projects that are not technically movies and which the Universal deal therefore can't touch
2 replies 1 retweet 9 likes -
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.