This *constant fucking pattern* of TERFs suddenly discovering something *exists* as soon as a trans woman gets noticed for succeeding in it, and hastily moving in to defend their ancestral territory from invasion
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @joslyoung and
"Trans women are ruining..." *spins wheel* "... roller derby!" "...Starcraft!" "...competitive women's weightlifting!" "...Reddit!" "...America's Next Top Model!"
7 replies 26 retweets 263 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @joslyoung and
Instead of insulting women and being an ignorant entitled man , how about you have a conversation with women why some things are a big fucking issue to women? But no fuck women who have their own spaces and sports and forums right. They aren't worthy of considered being human
12 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @GiniAndInsomnia @arthur_affect and
So Arthur explains how somebody was being ignorant and making a baseless argument with the sole purpose of hurting trans people and you call him ignorant and entitled? This isn't "a big fucking issue to women." It's a political football for transphobes.
2 replies 1 retweet 49 likes -
Replying to @LapineViolet @GiniAndInsomnia and
Right, and just pointing that the simple answer to OP's question, in the terms OP asked it, is "Yes" is somehow insulting women all over again
1 reply 1 retweet 25 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @LapineViolet and
An open invitation to swarm right back in and talk about how the other book is infinitely artistically superior and objectively more female and so on
1 reply 1 retweet 16 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @LapineViolet and
It's fucking absurd It's fucking OBVIOUS that it's much easier for cis women to get critical acclaim and win prizes and sell millions of books talking about "taboo" sexual topics than trans women Because many, many more cis women HAVE DONE IT
1 reply 4 retweets 37 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @LapineViolet and
On literally any region of the scale between "trashy/commercial" vs. "literary/artistic", between "porn" and "art" Cis women have gotten all the money for talking about sex -- as an obvious corollary of the fact trans women have, for the most part, not gotten money for jack shit
2 replies 3 retweets 25 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect
There is a whole show dedicated to 4 women talking about sex and it got two films and is getting a reboot. There is no such show for trans women and if there was it would be an outrage that it exists.
2 replies 0 retweets 20 likes -
Replying to @pellowponders
Right, it's not even about criticism of the book -- love the book, hate the book, whatever, that's a matter of your tastes It's that this argument "Well a REAL woman would never talk this way about sex" is massively insulting to EVERYONE in the conversation
1 reply 2 retweets 32 likes
There are way more graphic books about sex written by cis women, there are way more problematic books about sex written by cis women, there are plenty of cis women who *actually say* the awful things you're accusing Peters of that she didn't say
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect
I literally read a book recently which involved two women being in an age inappropriate relationship where the younger one starts off being abusive then they role-play assault and the older one pictures herself being in the body of a man she like and fucking the other. Cis woman
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.