Even if you could demonstrably prove that a work of fiction is not particularly "nice" to a religion, no artist has any kind of moral or social responsibility to be "nice" to a religion they don't care for, whether it's an imperializing one or not
-
-
Like, sure, you can *construct* a version of Buddhism that doesn't fit that description and many people have but in ordinary everyday Buddhism being gay is a "vice" born of untamed desire just like sleeping around or eating too much or gambling is
-
but Arthur, it's supposed to be a truism that all bigotry is a manifestation of Western influence
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.