Ah, I see, it is now okay to "pile on" women if they're atheists Hold up let me get a notepad so I can make a list
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @RunchieC and
I thought your rules were that it was OK to pile on to bigots? Alice's tweet was bigoted.
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @ZombieTron @RunchieC and
Yes, if we are following *my* rules then her being a woman has nothing to do with it Are we following my rules now? Are we all agreed?
2 replies 3 retweets 21 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @ZombieTron and
(And I wasn't talking about the Good Friday tweet but the multiple times in the past she's been swarmed by TERFs for saying something mildly trans-affirmative My whole issue here is that this "Protect women! Never dogpile women!" thing is utterly hypocritical)
2 replies 3 retweets 25 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @ZombieTron and
Is this the same Alice who blocked women with DSDs who objected to her comments on their conditions?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @RunchieC @ZombieTron and
Ah, okay, so now women can forfeit the protections of chivalry and be fair game for big strong burly men with lots of Twitter followers to pile onto, if they do certain bad things, like block certain people Let me get my notepad out again
3 replies 2 retweets 24 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @RunchieC and
Arthur Chu Retweeted Joel Matherin
I mean Jesus Christ you can't keep this mask up for more than a few minutes Hey Alex, your friend here seems to have a pretty big problem being respectful of women Unless Jameela Jamil doesn't count as "women" for some mysterious reasonhttps://twitter.com/MatherinJoel/status/1380088332873437185?s=20 …
Arthur Chu added,
2 replies 2 retweets 23 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @RunchieC and
Jameela Jamil is ONE woman and she's a prick. End of conversation.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MatherinJoel @RunchieC and
Yes, I know, all of the individual women you people harass are, by definition, ONE woman when taken individually
3 replies 2 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @RunchieC and
You stated with more confidence than a man like you should really have, that I have no respect for women (plural) on the basis of the fact that I have no respect for Jameela Jamil (singular). Which is horseshit, but you already know that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I'm making fun of Alex's bullshit In reality, of course, both you and I decide how much respect we give to individual women on a case-by-case basis based on those women's past words and actions
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @MatherinJoel and
It's just that Alex thinks he gets to decide which specific women stand in for "women" as a general concept when declaring that disrespecting them is a sign of general misogyny Based on his years of experience judging misogyny as a man
2 replies 2 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @MatherinJoel and
I wonder what his specific criteria are -- I mean obviously trans women never make the cut, but it's also pretty clearly only a narrow subset of cis women who make the cut
1 reply 2 retweets 16 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.