Same reason you're here, to "defend women", except as always you're here to "defend women" who are in the process of attacking
-
-
I don't see anyone being attacked mate. And I don't see you defending anyone. I'm still not clear on why you're campaigning for transwomen to be able to have abortions. Does it validate them? Why is that important to you?
2 replies 0 retweets 33 likes -
You don't see Grace being attacked because you have a mental block against the idea that trans women can experience suffering of any kind, and/or you're just a lying piece of shit
2 replies 5 retweets 97 likes -
Here's what I'm wondering. You want * Transwomen to have a woman's uterus transplanted into them * Then to have ova donated * Then to be given the cocktail of drugs and surgery needed to make a baby viable * And then finally to terminate the pregnancy Why? Why do you want this?
6 replies 1 retweet 43 likes -
Replying to @alexrubner @arthur_affect
do you honestly believe that this is what people mean when discussing the possibility of a trans woman eventually needing an abortion?
2 replies 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @UghitsAnjali @alexrubner
TERFs are, of course, mostly just conservatives in disguise but one thing they specifically are is anti-futurists They have to be, it's baked into their whole worldview
2 replies 6 retweets 29 likes -
Many of them explicitly say so -- "Transgenderism = transhumanism", as though it's obvious that "transhumanism" is a great evil (which is being pushed on us by the evil illuminati run by George Soros who created the COVID-19 pandemic etc)
1 reply 3 retweets 23 likes -
But even leaving aside the people trying to keep Bill Gates from turning them into the Borg with vaccine nanites In general you can't both believe in 1) the general concept of technological progress, and 2) the basic precepts of radical feminism And still be a TERF
1 reply 2 retweets 18 likes -
(This isn't a take from me, even, this is Shulamith Firestone back in the day -- the idea that it's obscene to talk about flying cars and spaceships and any other kind of fanciful sci-fi tech and NOT ask "Why the fuck would anyone in the future still need to give birth?")
1 reply 4 retweets 19 likes -
I mean, you can be a fucking weirdo like John C. Wright and write about science fiction futures where the "sex binary" still exists in a world of hyper-advanced technology because it's just the correct aesthetic for the human species God made pregnancy and pregnancy is beautiful
1 reply 2 retweets 17 likes
But if you're not a full right-wing traditionalist and you think that stuff like "the miracle of childbirth" is up for criticism and you hold the bare-minimum feminist position that it's had a negative impact on women's lives -- Then you gotta ask "Why not change all that?"
-
-
And the TERF worldview ends up requiring that you just dismiss this question "It's not possible, it will never be possible, and even asking if it is possible is a patriarchal trick to try to lure you into some kind of trap STOP THINKING ABOUT IT"
2 replies 2 retweets 13 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.