1/ A few people are mad at me because a philosopher who doesn't like me created a 2.5 hour video about why I'm wrong about GD stuff and I'm (obviously!) not going to watch it. (GamerGaters were the last people who asked me to watch 2-hour rebuttal YouTube videos.) The problem is:
-
Show this thread
-
2/ This person doesn't really know about this issue. She doesn't know what "clinically referred" means. She implies Dutch people are bringing their kids into the Amsterdam clinic just sorta for the hell of it or outta transphobia/homophobia. But you can just *read the research*pic.twitter.com/2LKSBrDYay
29 replies 3 retweets 137 likesShow this thread -
3/ and see that most of the kids in the clinic met the DSM IV criteria for what was Gender Identity Disorder, which (rumors to the contrary notwithstanding) does mean someone is rather dysphoric. So what she's doing is trolling. She is taking a body of clinical research that ispic.twitter.com/4U4NgDXJDc
14 replies 3 retweets 111 likesShow this thread -
4/ pretty thorough when it comes to documentation (whatever else you think about it) and then lazily, breezily posing well-poisoning questions that she wouldn't have if she'd spent a tiny bit of time reading. There's nothing to be gained from engaging with someone like this. Fin.
9 replies 4 retweets 146 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @jessesingal
This person is a known Woke extortionist. She has been persecuting Kathleen Stock for years. Avoid like the plague. Or else, hit back so hard she can't recover from it (by which I mean, legally). She is in the UK where defamation is much easier to prove.
75 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @ElectricAgora @jessesingal
I hope you have evidence to back up your claim that she is an extortionist or else she's not the only one who is apparently liable for legal action
1 reply 0 retweets 20 likes -
As Jesse Singal recently reminded us, "stalker" is technically a term for a specific federal crime, and anyone who uses that term carelessly for "a bad and creepy person" for someone who has not been convicted of that crime should be sued for libel
1 reply 1 retweet 22 likes
This exacting principle, which many people in Jesse's very own mentions seem to be unaware of when describing Christa's "obsession" with Jesse, surely applies even more to the far more serious crime of "extortion"
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.