I love how the point being made here is obvious - "breasts" as in the fatty tissue surrounding the actual mammary gland DON'T make milk, they don't do anything, your cup size has no impact whatsoever on your ability to breastfeed - but the commenters refuse to understand ithttps://twitter.com/drdevonprice/status/1377632565587275785 …
-
-
yeah I totally get that and agree with the whole thread.
-
I just don't think buttocks can be quite as clearly labled as a secondary sexual characteristic in line with breasts, though I'm more than willing to agree that there are strong hormonal influences on some parts of appearance.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
No one is saying that it's a built in law of nature that breasts are "objectively attractive" In fact it's the exact opposite of that Sexual selection happens when there's random variation in a characteristic that doesn't directly matter for anything
-
And as a result of that, if you want to get all judgey and anthropomorphic about it, it gets (sigh) "fetishized" That's WHY there's such a vast range of breast size in humans that comes with a vast difference of opinion on what the sexiest size for them to be is
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I'm fucking sick of dudes wibbling on about how pieces of my body exist for their purposes. Argue with the biologists.
-
Nobody's talking about your body parts specifically Sex is not "their purposes", women generally speaking are also interested in sex The existence of this conversation is not a sexism committed against you
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.