He qualified his remarks in a later tweet with a greater degree of specificity. My eyes still bugged out of my head when I read it. I clearly have a very different way of viewing human beings and their behavior to many of the people in this thread.
-
-
Literally everyone in the comments save for you correctly ascertained what his meaning was the first time. Some of us explicitly pointed out that you were being pedantic and over-literal about it even before he clarified for you.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
No, I don't think you're understanding what I'm saying. When he clarified it didn't help. I still think it's hyper-vigilant and evidence of splitting.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
And as I said in my very first response, is it truly hyper-vigilance when the threat is objectively verifiable? Isn't that just *normal* vigilance?
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes -
I don't believe the threat he refers to exists, so no, not to me.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Ha ha yes Trans people and their legal rights are doing just fine God fuck off
1 reply 2 retweets 36 likes -
Another misrepresentation. We're talking about your stated belief that all people are fundamentally dishonest and self interested. I don't see human beings that way. I didn't say anything about the status of legal rights for trans people.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BlamKaboom @arthur_affect and
mate, apologies if that was already brought up, but seeing as you're an obvious sockpuppet account, can you clarify if you're one of multiple singal sockpuppet accounts or just one of his stans? thanks so much in advance!
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @_amtiskaw @arthur_affect and
Happy to. I started this account long after departing the cesspool of twitter so as to anonymously discuss matters pertaining to my experience of sexual abuse within my industry. Since then I've been drawn into this convo. Obviously, I should depart again. Any further questions?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BlamKaboom @arthur_affect and
so just for the record: you created this sockpuppet in january this year, but inaugurated it with complaints about the allen documentary on 15th of march. since 16th of march you're focusing almost entirely on defending jesse singal in various threads.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Decent chance this just is Jesse wanting to talk about how Woody Allen is yet another victim of the "cancel culture mob" while avoiding cancelation for saying it But I'm not committing to the theory, it's not like assholes like this are thin on the ground
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.