And you have justified that declaration zero times. You have addressed counterpoints to it zero times. That you were gaslighting isn't a defense mechanism, it's simply observing patterns of behavior and describing where I've seen the pattern before. Doesn't defend me in any way.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
It is only untrue if you are being obtusely over-literal well beyond what every other person in the conversation has clearly understood him to have meant.
3 replies 0 retweets 23 likes -
Replying to @NECacophony @BlamKaboom and
And my position is that many people are great, but I've spent too many nights thinking about how I literally only avoided a hate crime in 2007 by random chance of which way I walked home from work that night, to believe you can just trust everybody to be good.
1 reply 0 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @NECacophony @BlamKaboom and
You might say that's maladaptive, but the fact that hate crimes continue unabated clearly indicates that it is a reasonable, not maladaptive, cause for concern Hell my own roommate was disowned and homeless for being gay. Marginalized people have legitimate cause for suspicion
2 replies 0 retweets 23 likes -
I wouldn't, and haven't said, it's maladaptive. In fact, I've repeatedly said I think people should have appropriate boundaries for their circumstances.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Yet literally the only reason any of this conversation is happening is because you deigned to declare a person's boundaries maladaptive for reasons you still will not specify.
1 reply 0 retweets 16 likes -
I've specified them repeatedly. Meanwhile, you've indicated your own defenses are basically sky high, which would explain the way this conversation has gone. No doubt you have real reasons for that, but has it prevented us from having the conversation we might have? I'd say so.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Really? Because I think the source of the problem is that you are categorically unwilling to specify your reasoning for your initial e-diagnosis, for reasons I can only speculate about, followed by pedantry, equivocation, arguments from personal incredulity, and general bad faith
3 replies 0 retweets 19 likes
I need to point out that telling someone who experiences their interactions with someone as "stalking" that they're *wrong* and committing *slander* - especially women talking about a man - is a textbook example of arrogantly trying to erode someone's boundaries
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.