And you have justified that declaration zero times. You have addressed counterpoints to it zero times. That you were gaslighting isn't a defense mechanism, it's simply observing patterns of behavior and describing where I've seen the pattern before. Doesn't defend me in any way.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
It is only untrue if you are being obtusely over-literal well beyond what every other person in the conversation has clearly understood him to have meant.
3 replies 0 retweets 23 likes -
He qualified his remarks in a later tweet with a greater degree of specificity. My eyes still bugged out of my head when I read it. I clearly have a very different way of viewing human beings and their behavior to many of the people in this thread.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Literally everyone in the comments save for you correctly ascertained what his meaning was the first time. Some of us explicitly pointed out that you were being pedantic and over-literal about it even before he clarified for you.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
No, I don't think you're understanding what I'm saying. When he clarified it didn't help. I still think it's hyper-vigilant and evidence of splitting.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
And as I said in my very first response, is it truly hyper-vigilance when the threat is objectively verifiable? Isn't that just *normal* vigilance?
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes -
I don't believe the threat he refers to exists, so no, not to me.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Ha ha yes Trans people and their legal rights are doing just fine God fuck off
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.