That still doesn't change the fact that to a modern person looking back in hindsight, the "transubstantiation debate" is both incredibly weird and incredibly stupid
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Though I guess it's roughly contemporaneous, the debate between Porphyry and Iamblichus over theurgy sort of touches on the same issues: whether ritual is an irrational claim to literal magic or a way of elevating the soul through actions that correspond in some way to divinity
-
Not to disagree, just to say that those questions were of that milieu!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.