I think one of the ugly side effects of constant Internet-debating about trans rights -- something I've probably contributed to -- is the idea that the debate itself determines the validity of the concept, that transness is on trial in a courtroom or something
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @arthur_affect
Specifically on the sports issue, I think both sides need to do more work to come up with a best solution. Outside of that I pretty much agree
7 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MonkAaronius @arthur_affect
Nope. Trans people participating in sport alongside cis people is fine, actually.
1 reply 0 retweets 31 likes -
Replying to @eigenvectrix @arthur_affect
https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000178-1a7a-d750-a77a-3efba0ac0000 … a majority of registered voters support the bans. Popular opinion swung in favor of previous civil rights moments in large part due to superior arguments. The case still needs to be made imo
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MonkAaronius @arthur_affect
"in large part due to superior arguments"? Have you read the thread you are replying to? Also, let me be polite with you here: I really don't give a damn whether you think the case needs to be made or not, and nor should any right-thinking person The case has been made
1 reply 0 retweets 19 likes -
Replying to @eigenvectrix @arthur_affect
Imagine MLK deciding not to go to Selma because “the case had already been made” during the March on Washington
4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MonkAaronius @arthur_affect
So what you're actually saying is the case *has* already been made and we should switch to making large, dramatic gestures for the purpose of illustrating that continued failure to acknowledge that will no longer be tolerated. Cool, works for me!
2 replies 0 retweets 25 likes -
Replying to @eigenvectrix @MonkAaronius
MLK was absolutely not a "policy analyst" or "scientist" of any kind, he was a literal preacher, and his speeches and demonstrations are 180-degrees apart from anything you might call "rational debate" He had plenty of critics saying so at the time
2 replies 6 retweets 44 likes -
The hilarious thing about what a Rorschach blot MLK has become is how wildly people project not just ideas/opinions but *tones of voice* and *methodology* onto him that he had nothing to do with MLK never, once, soberly "debated Black crime statistics" with a racist police chief
4 replies 6 retweets 50 likes
He was partisan af, he drew his line in the sand and committed to it publicly as hard as he could "These are my people, I stand with my people, I want them to have freedom, prosperity, a better life, and I DO NOT CARE what your reasons are for withholding these things"
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.