I love this argument, it's amazing "Sure, Bitcoin is itself a tremendous waste of resources, but have you considered it will also SAVE immense resources by causing a global economic recession and sending you back to a simple village life"
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @FranckLeroy_
Great, people who think we need to return to a simple village life to safe the planet should buy Bitcoin then
I am sincere here2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @capoczino @FranckLeroy_
Okay so put your money where your mouth is then Log off, sell all your electronic shit and put the money into BTC mining stock, roll up your sleeves and go outside and start tilling those fields for planting season You're gonna need the practice
5 replies 3 retweets 75 likes -
Lol I can't believe you don't see the perversity here that if everything works out as you want it to the planet will NOT be saved because society's total energy output will still have to go up to feed the demand for Bitcoin mining
2 replies 2 retweets 35 likes -
It's literally the worst of both worlds - climate change and fossil fuel consumption continuing to accelerate but I don't even get to use any of that power to watch TV It's like some ironic planet from Star Trek
3 replies 13 retweets 63 likes -
I had to have a long, long think and I finally realize that he's claiming Bitcoin stops plastic consumption by making people not want to spend money, which is absolutely spectacular.
1 reply 0 retweets 20 likes -
Replying to @mary_pezzulo @arthur_affect and
Like every single time they're interviewing a person who randomly made a million dollars with Bitcoin on the news, what did that person do? THEY BOUGHT A NEW CAR AND A HOUSE. It's money. You spend it.
2 replies 0 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @mary_pezzulo @arthur_affect and
You obviously never owned bitcoin. Bitcoin only increases in value, it doesn't make sense to spend it. The opposite is true for fiat money. Why do you think central banks around the world desperately try to create inflation? This is explicitly meant to *increase* consumption.
6 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @lost_dogz @mary_pezzulo and
Yeah, which is good, because "consumption" on one end is "employment" on the other end Rephrase everything you say about "excess consumption" in honest terms - "unnecessary jobs" - and see how populist it sounds then
1 reply 1 retweet 23 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @mary_pezzulo and
Are you saying we should consume in excess to protect unnecessary jobs?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
I'm saying I don't care for your definition of "excess" and "unnecessary"
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @mary_pezzulo and
You were the one who brought up those two terms, not me And you're avoiding the question
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.