WHAT is having its history traced, and is being proven to be real, and is having its history placed in context? It's not the artwork itself, because the NFT doesn't tell you jack shit about the actual painting
-
-
It's like that incredibly creepy game someone tried to market that was a simulated "celebrity stock market" where you could "buy shares" in real people and watch their prices rise and fall with their popularity
-
Obviously, this stock market only existed in their stupid app, and carried no actual obligations of "ownership" of any kind from the real people Just as obviously, this was a fucking weird concept for a game and a deeply invasive one that pissed off everyone who heard about it
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's trademark violation, certainly. And fraud. And it's upsetting that people are using your name to make money. But to legitimise the trade of nonsense by calling it theft inherently supports that process. It implies that the process creates something of value.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.