The "ownership" of artwork a blockchain NFT gives you is so meaningless you had to use three increasingly meaningless synonyms for ithttps://twitter.com/RealAllenHena/status/1370151325359570949 …
-
-
Only this is even more absurd, like "It can't be a fake painting, it came in secure tamper proof packaging, and interfering with the mail is a federal crime! When would someone have been able to sneak a fake in there?!"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
For an awful lot of the things in question, I don’t really see what prevents multiple people making multiple tokens for them and all claiming theirs is the “real” ones. With physical art, someone has possession.
-
the argument seems to be "well it would only have value if its the first version tokenized by the actual artist" which is obviously not true in practice, and again even if it were its completely meaningless
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.