The "ownership" of artwork a blockchain NFT gives you is so meaningless you had to use three increasingly meaningless synonyms for ithttps://twitter.com/RealAllenHena/status/1370151325359570949 …
-
-
"I'm keeping the actual copyright, of course, but I'm auctioning off the right to have your name listed on my website as the 'owner' of the 'first copy' of my digital artwork Then if you sell it to someone else, just send me proof of the transaction and I'll update my site "
-
This would do LITERALLY EVERYTHING an NFT actually does at an IMMENSELY cheaper cost One computer updating one server on a semi-regular basis, a *tiny* and *static* energy expenditure But this doesn't feel "real" - it feels chintzy and fake That website could go down you know
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Such a centralized setup is what we have now and why we have the problems we have today. Once again, your knowledge and understanding of the concepts of decentralization are demonstrably ignorant. Officially a waste of my time.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If we're talking single page sites, you could have like 100 of the sites on that 1 bluehost account for $100 per year. Hello, I could build you a platform where we'd have like 1,000 sites on that single blue house account.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.