The "ownership" of artwork a blockchain NFT gives you is so meaningless you had to use three increasingly meaningless synonyms for ithttps://twitter.com/RealAllenHena/status/1370151325359570949 …
-
-
Good Lord I can't believe I even have to have this argument right now when there's like ten Twitter accounts you can tag to instantly mint a token for someone else's art by replying to their post
-
It's literally the joke from The Little Prince where the guy is making a list of every star and planet and celestial object he sees in the sky so he can write in his ledger that he owns them and if you want him to change the entry in the ledger so you own them you have to pay him
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I can introduce you to the concept of metadata which tells you a whole lot about the actual painting. What do you know about IPFS? ERC721? ERC1155? That could help with what. Time always provides historical context and so does who owns it and when, also who created it and when.
-
And in what sense does this have any meaning for me, the person who "owns" the label containing this information, saying that I "own" the painting itself
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah, i mean, provenance is an important concept when applied to actual real-world items? But it doesn't work AT ALL with NFT shit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.