This is something worth addressing - I am NOT saying prioritize former reactionaries, to be clear, I'm saying focus on a realistic strategy of how to reach non-reactionaries: Radicalism is not going to sway the apolitical because radicalism has a sizable social cost.
-
-
People who believe they have an obligation to pay for the well being of all of their countrymen get VERY touchy about what exactly the definition of "their countrymen" is
-
Yeah. And I think on here, in particular, we're dealing with a far more idealistic and frankly cosmopolitan segment of the population than necessarily is the norm even in Europe.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
God, yes.
End of conversation
-
-
-
And also issues surrounding alternative fertility options. Sure, a lot are progressive when it comes to birth control, but things like surrogacy or adoption?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I have backed out of several discussions this past week about how european nations can have good socialism because they're ethnically homogeneous. European ethnic homogeneity (which is itself an iffy thing, no one mentions Roma/Travelers) didn't magically and bloodlessly happen.
-
*looks at the notion of ethnic homogeneity and contrasts it with the make-up of the England, France and Belgium teams that reached the semis of the last World Cup*
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.