Using trademark to silence critics is fucky too though anyway. ;)
-
-
Which means the general public ends up getting this overall sense "This law doesn't really exist, it doesn't have any objective meaning whatsoever, it's just whatever lawyers think will benefit them at any given moment" This is, generally, not a great thing to happen
-
Like for a colorful parallel this is how sodomy laws were for most of their history Yes, it was technically illegal for anyone to ever give anyone else a blowjob in Texas No, this was not enforced, especially among Christian married couples
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Sure, it stinks, and the prior alternative of instant lawsuit and ridiculous statutory damages stunk more and thus what? On the other hand, people for whom a $100 royalty check for a book printed in 1991 means they get to have electricity another month is something real.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.