The idea of a world where there's no such thing as owning a house is far, far more relevant to homelessness and hunger and poverty and so on than a world where there's no such thing as owning a manuscript But that's not the current struggle, right, that gets put off till later
-
-
All websites would be government/community websites and anyone could upload anything or download anything and permissions to those physical machines were controlled by a democratic process THEN you couldn't have a Facebook or a Google or a Twitter wielding monopoly power
Show this thread -
Can you actually imagine that world? Is that ANYWHERE on the horizon? You can imagine Congress someday saying "Copyright isn't a thing anymore" but can you imagine Congress saying to Peter Thiel "Uh, excuse me, you can't OWN a server rack, all server racks belong to the people"
Show this thread -
No, of course not Making that the rule would *actually be* communism It would *actually overturn* most of how we think property works in the US, it would probably be impossible without a massive shift in our constitutional order So nobody talks about it
Show this thread -
We talk about abolition of IP as the best we can do, even though as long as *real* property still exists then we still live in a fundamentally capitalist, monopolist society and IP abolition just shuffles tokens around (in many cases, toward people with a ton of existing power)
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.