It pretty clearly is seeing as nobody's actually in a position to pass that shit! It's not happening! Hypothetical "could" is not "will." And EVEN IN THAT CASE, vaccinating the entire population is an objective good that many epidemiologists have called for.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @mssilverstein @Nymphomachy
And yet the primary vectors of the virus are the highly mobile populations of wealthy nations traveling around.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @loudpenitent @mssilverstein
Vaccinated 1 percenters can almost certainly spread the virus to unvaccinated people so what difference does it make
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Nymphomachy @mssilverstein
Why assume that? The current research suggests the most successful vaccine stops spread as well as symptoms, as I recall?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @loudpenitent @mssilverstein
They've been incredibly cagey about suggesting that
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Yeah from what I've read if your vaccinated you're still infectious
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @saintwalker98 @Nymphomachy and
They have to say that because they're not allowed to say otherwise, because they don't have any tests showing evidence of effect on infectiousness (because that's far more difficult to ethically test)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
But logically if you boost immunity to the point that you think you can guarantee no symptoms then the impact on infectiousness also has to be significant
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.