Is this where we all once more discover that so-called "logical fallacies" like "guilt by association" actually do exist for valid reasons given that none of us have infinite time and energy to make perfectly unbiased decisions about how much to trust other peoplehttps://twitter.com/RationalWiki/status/1362914282250391553 …
-
Show this thread
-
Do I have to throw in trendy Bay Area techbro jargon like "heuristic" and "pattern-matching" and "Overton window" and "metis" and so forth or can I just say "Lie down with dogs, get up with fleas"
4 replies 8 retweets 80 likesShow this thread -
It is astonishing how FUCKING STUPID a theoretically at least mildlly intelligent person comes off if they're just determined to refuse to believe in simple concepts like "racism"pic.twitter.com/N5jiwQe7CJ
3 replies 11 retweets 81 likesShow this thread -
By the way, this the same post in which SCOTT HIMSELF clearly explained he is not a feminist, and used the exact same argument I would use for why his dipshit fans keep arguing he must be a feministpic.twitter.com/TnJsi592FW
1 reply 1 retweet 35 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @arthur_affect
When a conclusion is logically sound, it is *mandatory* that one believe it — that’s the nature of logical reasoning, the conclusion follows absolutely When the logic isn’t sound, it is merely “not NECESSARILY” true. It is often correct anyway!
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
Yeah that's the fallacy fallacy
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.