yeah I'm pissed off about organizations *with responsibilities* that have huge war chests putting that money toward a very esoteric and fleeting circus when there's still millions of people going without BREAD, thank you for playing
-
-
And, like, a hardcore Austrian school ancap guy would be like "But they had the RIGHT to cast that vote because THEY provided more value to society than others, which is where the money they spent came from! The market is the CORRECT way to prioritize human desires!"
-
I hope we can agree that these people are, in fact, turds And that because they are turds the whole "Who exactly gets to vote how we as a society spend our collective effort" is a big unsolved problem still
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Maybe we should just cancel NASA, and forget about all the actual enduring scientific good it provides, and instead give the American people an extra $60 per year. Heck, that's almost enough to buy a single computer game!
-
And then we can focus on climate change! Except that we just lost one of the, if not *the*, biggest resources for information and learning about climate science. Oops!
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.