I mean look if you're gonna talk about selfish Americans spending money on stuff that makes us happy while others suffer The UN says that it would cost $30 billion to end world hunger every year
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @Nymphomachy and
If you canceled Perseverance entirely and put all $2.75 billion meant for those eleven years into one year of feeding people, you'd barely make a dent
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Nymphomachy and
On the other hand, the film industry reports that the total US box office take every year has been $40 billion or so and rising for the past ten years
3 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Nymphomachy and
So if Americans took that money and they spent 75% of it on feeding people instead, that would be it Nobody in the whole world would be hungry It wouldn't even be an end to all movies, just *cutting back* on movies by 3/4
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Nymphomachy and
And this is, sure, kind of an obnoxious stat to throw around, because we won't do that and there's obvious reasons why berating some individual person to stop watching movies and give the money to charity is a waste of time and unfair to them
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Nymphomachy and
I personally like movies I don't think trying to divert money away from the film industry specifically by saying movies are mostly garbage (and the majority of movies that are made do suck) is going to be a winning PR move There's other places to find that $30 billion
1 reply 1 retweet 10 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Nymphomachy and
The problem of course is that lots of people have their special interest (hence the term "special interest groups") and when they argue with each other they all say it's obvious someone else has too much money and you should take it from that guy over there and leave them alone
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Nymphomachy and
I think there's a lot of billionaires who need taxing, and I think there's a whole military-industrial complex that could use defunding Lots of people agree with me on that
1 reply 1 retweet 10 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Nymphomachy and
The problem being the billionaires have trained attack dogs that fight viciously in their defense and the national security people have half the country convinced that relaxing the Pentagon budget even by a few percentage points will lead to their kids all speaking Mandarin
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Nymphomachy and
So we are where we are The problem is that I think very visible stuff like NASA, whose "practical benefit" is hard to articulate, becomes a lightning rod during hard times But I continue to maintain whether you love or hate space stuff it is not that big a deal
2 replies 2 retweets 8 likes
Going after NASA isn't *quite* as pointless as Rush Limbaugh (peace be upon his soul) ranting about the NEA's mere $162 million budget being YOUR TAX DOLLARS spent to fund some degenerate making clay models of his penis in a Brooklyn loft But I see it as in the same genre
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.