The funny thing is that the explanation for Cruella's motives in the original was perfectly clear - she's an "eccentric" spoiled rich lady from inherited wealth who never had to work a day in her life and as she gets old and bored her little weird impulses become obsessionshttps://twitter.com/MelanieMoore/status/1362127334610935809 …
-
-
Then again the gaming industry has been pretty cavalier about using real public figures' likenesses without permission sohttps://www.thegamer.com/seraphine-league-of-legends-likeness-copy/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
that whole subplot with him trying to make a dog based video game was actually kind of intriguing
-
They kept rejecting it even though it had astonishingly ahead of the time graphics for 1996. They should have hired him just because he was clearly a technical genius, even if he did keep trying to submit games based on his dog.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Ouch! Not so blatantly libelous anyway but still.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Also in that movie he makes her the bad guy *after* she's exposed for trying to murder a bunch of puppies.
-
Whereas in the book there's no kind of rift at all, except refusing to sell her the puppies and incompatible capsaicin tolerances.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.