The funny thing is that the explanation for Cruella's motives in the original was perfectly clear - she's an "eccentric" spoiled rich lady from inherited wealth who never had to work a day in her life and as she gets old and bored her little weird impulses become obsessionshttps://twitter.com/MelanieMoore/status/1362127334610935809 …
-
-
I mean she does take his puppies, but she does so by more direct means than litigation
-
I'm not sure his record label would've let the line "She ought to be locked up and never released" past legal, even with the honest opinion exemption
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I can imagine her, in private, dancing around while conducting with her cigarette holder.
- Show replies
-
-
-
He does say that "if she doesn't scare you, no evil thing will." I'd say that includes libel suits.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Only in the film. The animation anyway. I haven't seen the start of the live action version.
-
The live-action version has a depiction of her used as the horrifying final boss of Roger's video game ...Which has a bit more plausible deniability I guess since it doesn't actually say her name, but still
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
In the UK where their libel laws are a little more fierce than they are in the US.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
in the book he's just rich. Like, he's an accountant or something for the government and they just have a lot of money.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
the fact that it's set in england makes it even more of an artifact for that reason
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.