It is fully consistent with APA guidelines to publish anonymized cases. If you have information that he didn't do so, you should report him to APA. But surely you are just a troll.
-
-
Replying to @NotoriousAapje @_amtiskaw and
It's not about whether he committed a formal APA violation, it's about whether his patients might have been offended if they'd known the way he talked about patients on his blog, and if they'd have had a right to know about him doing so before going to him for treatment
3 replies 2 retweets 99 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @NotoriousAapje and
yeah when you put it like this, "do siskind's Black patients have a right to know that he thinks they are genetically inferior" seems like a pretty straightforward question to answer
4 replies 6 retweets 80 likes -
Replying to @perdricof @arthur_affect and
Does he believe they are genetically inferior? I've followed a few links people have presented as proof and I've yet to find anything of the sorts What I have found is the opposite
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @MightyCapybara @perdricof and
Yeah, I also definitely see universal basic income as a terribly racist idea Right?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @MightyCapybara @VierDrey and
He doesn't even pretend to pick Murray randomly, he *specifically cites* Murray as "the only one with me" in the "southeast" quadrant of his four-quadrant map of attitudes about poverty (determined by heredity + should be addressed by social programs)
1 reply 2 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @MightyCapybara and
I.e. kinder, gentler hierarchical society Don't demand that the underclass rise up and be given the upper class' jobs, that'd be disastrous, what with their low IQ But don't squash and immiserate them either Be *nice*
1 reply 1 retweet 16 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @MightyCapybara and
You can be an underclass without being *poor* and *starving* Just give them a check in the mail every month and keep them away from any important decisions (I really challenge you to tell me what Scott is saying here if he's not saying this)
1 reply 1 retweet 13 likes
I mean, I will myself come out and say that I strongly oppose this, and say exactly why UBI is a starting point, not an endpoint The point is not for the underclass to take the ruling class' *money*, it's to take their *jobs* It's to take away their power to rule
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @MightyCapybara and
Taking their money as charity is better than having nothing, sure But it's not the end goal at all The end goal is to not have these other people making decisions for you because they think they're smarter than you in the first place
1 reply 2 retweets 18 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.