It is fully consistent with APA guidelines to publish anonymized cases. If you have information that he didn't do so, you should report him to APA. But surely you are just a troll.
-
-
Replying to @NotoriousAapje @_amtiskaw and
It's not about whether he committed a formal APA violation, it's about whether his patients might have been offended if they'd known the way he talked about patients on his blog, and if they'd have had a right to know about him doing so before going to him for treatment
3 replies 2 retweets 99 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @NotoriousAapje and
yeah when you put it like this, "do siskind's Black patients have a right to know that he thinks they are genetically inferior" seems like a pretty straightforward question to answer
4 replies 6 retweets 80 likes -
Replying to @perdricof @arthur_affect and
Does he believe they are genetically inferior? I've followed a few links people have presented as proof and I've yet to find anything of the sorts What I have found is the opposite
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VierDrey @perdricof and
There are a couple things "the opposite" could mean: 1) Black people are genetically *superior* to white people 2) Eugenics is total bunk, and none of the important traits that people think of as "superior" or "inferior" can be mapped to genetic causes in any predictable way
2 replies 1 retweet 17 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @VierDrey and
I see no evidence Scott believes either one 2) is what I think, and Scott is very clearly, at best, skeptical to this point of view -- and the community he surrounds himself with is actively and viciously hostile to it ("blank slatism", etc.)
2 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @VierDrey and
He obviously does not believe "the opposite" -- my best guess is he believes a softened version of it ("Black people are like 1.5 standard deviations below white people on average in the g-factor and this tragically explains most racialized social dysfunction")
2 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @VierDrey and
He comes very very close to saying this multiple times but "taboos" actually directly bringing race into it -- but, in the end, so what
2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @VierDrey and
When he gave his big spiel about "I like eugenics and basic income guarantees" the example he used wasn't Black people but a stereotypical white Southern redneck, as someone whose poverty was due to heritable factors and intractable to policy changes So what? That's not better
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @perdricof and
What, eugenics is just "hereditary" So, believing that the colour of my eyes comes from my parents is eugenics now?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
No, it becomes eugenics when you think heritable traits like the color of people's eyes are *important*, and that there should be policy to address the lack of desirable traits or excess of undesirable ones in the population
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.