For the analogy to work, the victim would have to rape herself. Lotta rationalists appear to be bad at basic logic.
-
-
I see no evidence Scott believes either one 2) is what I think, and Scott is very clearly, at best, skeptical to this point of view -- and the community he surrounds himself with is actively and viciously hostile to it ("blank slatism", etc.)
-
He obviously does not believe "the opposite" -- my best guess is he believes a softened version of it ("Black people are like 1.5 standard deviations below white people on average in the g-factor and this tragically explains most racialized social dysfunction")
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah, if you are stuck in that mindset, except there is at least one more - people are not inferior or superior when considering their "race"
-
Ah, yes, the rhetorical dodge where IQ/the g-factor don't imply you're a better or worse *person* It's just that, in Scott's view, the g-factor determines how good you are at doing nearly anything that matters in life, and determines who can be safely trusted to make decisions
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.