Skip to content
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
arthur_affect's profile
Arthur Chu
Arthur Chu
Arthur Chu
Verified account
@arthur_affect

Tweets

Arthur ChuVerified account

@arthur_affect

Mad genius, comedian, actor, and freelance voiceover artist broadcasting from the distant shores of Lake Erie (he/him)

Broadview Heights, Ohio
arthur-chu.com
Joined August 2009

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Sigismond‏ @Sigismond_bis Feb 17
      Replying to @arthur_affect @Eristae and

      Laws do not need to be consistent? Interesting

      2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    2. Arthur Chu‏Verified account @arthur_affect Feb 17
      Replying to @Sigismond_bis @Eristae and

      Lol what you're talking about isn't even "inconsistency", just SCOPE You haven't even given a definition of "private information", just asserted it as though it were obvious

      2 replies 1 retweet 15 likes
    3. Arthur Chu‏Verified account @arthur_affect Feb 17
      Replying to @arthur_affect @Sigismond_bis and

      And the idea that something that involves your personal life is automatically "private information" is absurd What if someone cheats on their wife by parading their mistress in front of everyone at the office Christmas party, then feels bad and tries to kill the story

      2 replies 1 retweet 13 likes
    4. Arthur Chu‏Verified account @arthur_affect Feb 17
      Replying to @arthur_affect @Sigismond_bis and

      Anyway to answer your question, no, laws don't have to be consistent They have exceptions and qualifications and ask that shit both written into the statute and carved out by case law all the time That's half the fun

      1 reply 1 retweet 9 likes
    5. Arthur Chu‏Verified account @arthur_affect Feb 17
      Replying to @arthur_affect @Sigismond_bis and

      I don't think "anti-doxing laws" that specifically prohibit sharing certain specific facts about someone constitute some kind of logical inconsistency with the First Amendment But I also don't actually care

      3 replies 1 retweet 7 likes
    6. Sigismond‏ @Sigismond_bis Feb 17
      Replying to @arthur_affect @Eristae and

      Isn't the very point of case law to maintain consistency?

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    7. Kelly Kinkade‏ @AB9RF Feb 17
      Replying to @Sigismond_bis @arthur_affect and

      No.

      1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
    8. Sigismond‏ @Sigismond_bis Feb 17
      Replying to @AB9RF @arthur_affect and

      So the same situation doesn't end up with two different outcomes depending on the judge?

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    9. Räv‏ @Eristae Feb 17
      Replying to @Sigismond_bis @AB9RF and

      The same situation absolutely can and does end up with two different outcomes with two different judges. You don't know what you are talking about.

      2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes
    10. Sigismond‏ @Sigismond_bis Feb 17
      Replying to @Eristae @AB9RF and

      Interpreting law isn't always straightforward, case laws ensure interpretation is consistent in similar situations. Isn't that the whole point?

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      Arthur Chu‏Verified account @arthur_affect Feb 17
      Replying to @Sigismond_bis @Eristae and

      You're not even keeping your use of the word "consistent" consistent You're talking about application of the same law being consistent over time, not laws themselves all being "consistent" with some overarching principle you think they logically imply

      1:55 AM - 17 Feb 2021
      • 1 Retweet
      • 10 Likes
      • Cyn Bingo Bango stars my destination Ollie Hood Kelly Kinkade ultralaser David Gerard 🐍👑 🌷 ACAB Whisperer skaffen-amtiskaw
      2 replies 1 retweet 10 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Arthur Chu‏Verified account @arthur_affect Feb 17
          Replying to @arthur_affect @Sigismond_bis and

          There is nothing "inconsistent" about making a law that says "It's illegal to mow your lawn on Thursdays but not any other day of the week" You can say it's *arbitrary*, but so the fuck what The whole point of a law is to add more granularity to what you're allowed to do

          3 replies 2 retweets 10 likes
        3. Arthur Chu‏Verified account @arthur_affect Feb 17
          Replying to @arthur_affect @Sigismond_bis and

          You're saying I can't ban propagation of one specific kind of "private information" without banning *all* sharing of *all* information that *someone* could define as "private" That's fucking stupid I absolutely can -- that's the whole point of making laws

          1 reply 2 retweets 12 likes
        4. Show replies
        1. Kelly Kinkade‏ @AB9RF Feb 17
          Replying to @arthur_affect @Sigismond_bis and

          A lot of our laws are expressed by a broad general principle, followed by a list of exceptions, and then exceptions to the exceptions, and so on and so forth. Often, these exceptions end up being created through litigation, and are thus established via case law.

          0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info