-
-
Replying to @Eristae @arthur_affect and
Yeah, I asked about them, I was not debating what they are - I have no idea
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Sigismond_bis @arthur_affect and
If you didn't want to "debate" then, then maybe don't bring them into the conversation, lol. Otherwise they'll get talked about, horror horror. But I'm going to guess that where you are, newspapers report on affairs and people tell spouses they were cheated on, too
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @Eristae @arthur_affect and
What is there to debate about what US laws ARE? They are what they are, whether they make sense or not
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Sigismond_bis @arthur_affect and
"Sure, I brought up laws, but that's not because I wanted anyone to talk about them." Suuuuure.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @Eristae @arthur_affect and
Sigismond Retweeted Räv
I am not disputing what US laws *are*... you are not very brighthttps://mobile.twitter.com/Eristae/status/1361950570119110657 …
Sigismond added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Sigismond_bis @arthur_affect and
Räv Retweeted Sigismond
Räv added,
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Eristae @Sigismond_bis and
You are honestly so ridiculous. I talked about free speech, you brought up the law as limiting free speech. Now you want to ignore the law *which you brought up* because it's not limiting speech.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Eristae @Sigismond_bis and
Räv Retweeted Sigismond
You weren't just "oh, I don't know what the law is, what could they be," You used the fact that laws limit speech to try to make a point But now that they aren't limiting speech, you don't know the laws and can't talk about themhttps://twitter.com/Sigismond_bis/status/1361948050210521093?s=19 …
Räv added,
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Eristae @arthur_affect and
They DO limit free speech, you cannot publicly display someone's address, and yes I'm using it to make a point about consistency ; if you can't reveal an address, why can you reveal other purely private matters. I don't dispute if you actually can or not
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Because people generally consider evidence about a person's character and past actions valuable when making decisions about how to interact with them
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @Sigismond_bis and
there is no "real life", there is only the simulation
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
