Skip to content
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
arthur_affect's profile
Arthur Chu
Arthur Chu
Arthur Chu
Verified account
@arthur_affect

Tweets

Arthur ChuVerified account

@arthur_affect

Mad genius, comedian, actor, and freelance voiceover artist broadcasting from the distant shores of Lake Erie (he/him)

Broadview Heights, Ohio
arthur-chu.com
Joined August 2009

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Aapje‏ @NotoriousAapje Feb 16
      Replying to @davidgerard @GabrielObray and

      You are a black and white thinker and have exactly the kind of attitude that I reject: that Scott was fair game because his OPSEC wasn't perfect. Also, do you have evidence for your claim?

      4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    2. Arthur Chu‏Verified account @arthur_affect Feb 16
      Replying to @NotoriousAapje @davidgerard and

      If his name was such a big secret then why have I, someone who has never been within 100 miles of him irl and openly despises him and most of the people he knows, known it since 2014

      3 replies 2 retweets 39 likes
    3. Arthur Chu‏Verified account @arthur_affect Feb 16
      Replying to @arthur_affect @NotoriousAapje and

      Anyway this, itself, is black and white thinking, absurdly so Extrapolated even a little way out it makes the concept of journalism impossible - "You're NOT ALLOWED to say things about me I don't want said"

      3 replies 2 retweets 27 likes
    4. Arthur Chu‏Verified account @arthur_affect Feb 16
      Replying to @arthur_affect @NotoriousAapje and

      Talking about things people don't want talked about is a delicate matter Doing it for its own sake is, sure, just being a jerk But there obviously exists a countervailing ethical pressure where you have to ask "How many people would be upset to know they were ignorant of this"

      1 reply 1 retweet 23 likes
    5. Arthur Chu‏Verified account @arthur_affect Feb 16
      Replying to @arthur_affect @NotoriousAapje and

      It's normally no one else's business if someone cheats on their spouse, but if that person is famous, if they're a church pastor, if they write self-help books about relationships, if they get praised as a "role model" Then it starts being other people's business

      1 reply 1 retweet 37 likes
    6. Arthur Chu‏Verified account @arthur_affect Feb 16
      Replying to @arthur_affect @NotoriousAapje and

      You start to have to wrestle with the fact that you are, in fact, committing a sin of omission and helping deceive people every time someone decides to give that person their trust or admiration they wouldn't if they knew the whole story

      1 reply 1 retweet 23 likes
    7. Sigismond‏ @Sigismond_bis Feb 16
      Replying to @arthur_affect @NotoriousAapje and

      Merely being "famous" should not negate your right to privacy

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    8. Arthur Chu‏Verified account @arthur_affect Feb 16
      Replying to @Sigismond_bis @NotoriousAapje and

      You keep talking about "rights" This is not a *legal* right that exists in the form you say it does, and if it did -- the right to not have people say true things they know about you because it's harmful to you -- then "free speech" wouldn't meaningfully be a right

      2 replies 3 retweets 29 likes
    9. Arthur Chu‏Verified account @arthur_affect Feb 16
      Replying to @arthur_affect @Sigismond_bis and

      I can say that talking about someone's "private business" online is not nice I can say it's not a good way to use your time and that if you're trying to run a respectable media business, dunking on randos all the time is bad for your brand But it's not violating "rights"

      3 replies 1 retweet 18 likes
    10. Arthur Chu‏Verified account @arthur_affect Feb 16
      Replying to @arthur_affect @Sigismond_bis and

      I mean I just talked about how respectable middle-class Americans tend to think other people's adultery is "none of your business" but sheesh are you *violating someone's rights* if you decide to go on Facebook and tell everyone how shitty your ex is

      2 replies 1 retweet 16 likes
      Arthur Chu‏Verified account @arthur_affect Feb 16
      Replying to @arthur_affect @Sigismond_bis and

      The Scott defenders are making a very, very strong claim here They're not even talking about "uncovering private information", they're talking about making already-public information TOO public

      11:36 PM - 16 Feb 2021
      • 3 Retweets
      • 19 Likes
      • Hoydenne Rachel (she/her) Cyn Dominic David ☭ a catherine scorned Matthew Whelan Ollie Hood ZJ Thorne
      2 replies 3 retweets 19 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Arthur Chu‏Verified account @arthur_affect Feb 16
          Replying to @arthur_affect @Sigismond_bis and

          It's not even that hundreds, thousands of people didn't already know who Scott was, including lots of famous people, including strangers who dislike him He specifically wanted the threshold of "notability" of this information to stay below the level where his patients might know

          1 reply 2 retweets 12 likes
        3. Arthur Chu‏Verified account @arthur_affect Feb 16
          Replying to @arthur_affect @Sigismond_bis and

          Because he expects his patients to be "low-information" uneducated people who don't spend much time on the Internet and don't know much about the tech sector (despite living in San Francisco) and generally don't know much stuff ...Put like that, it sounds pretty damn ugly

          0 replies 3 retweets 14 likes
        4. End of conversation

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info