The chans grasped that the only way to maintain anonymity is to make it impossible to maintain identity. Even Q got identified
-
-
Replying to @sleeperjoebiden @GabrielObray and
I see chan-style anonymity as something that it's at least *possible* to grant to everyone as a universal right ("A Tor client on every laptop!") It's just not a good thing that most people would want or benefit from
1 reply 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @sleeperjoebiden and
And as long as meatspace actually exists and we need to actually, you know, live and do stuff in the world rather than all discoursing constantly from our IV-and-catheter-equipped Posting Pods, it isn't actually total liberation It's an asymmetric tool for abuse
1 reply 1 retweet 14 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @sleeperjoebiden and
All the chan anon posters have absolute power to use any online-linked tool at their disposal to fuck with anyone who *isn't* a 24/7 poster and *has to have* a real-life, trackable, persistent identity, be they an actual celebrity or just some rando who caught their attention
1 reply 2 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @sleeperjoebiden and
That's the grotesque irony of all this shit That chan boards are known for *being hotbeds of doxing* Same chuds who flip out at anyone knowing their primary email address think they have the constitutional right to post photos of streamers' houses
1 reply 2 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @sleeperjoebiden and
But anyway Pseudonymity as this absolute right, unlike anonymity, is just incoherent It's self-contradictory, it collapses as soon as you try to push it
1 reply 1 retweet 10 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @sleeperjoebiden and
It's not the right to just erase everything untraceably and start over periodically, it's the right to demand some things be verifiable and trackable and other things *must not* To *control* what other people notice and remember about the persona you put into the world
1 reply 1 retweet 10 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @sleeperjoebiden and
It is impossible to execute long-term without the *active cooperation* of everyone involved To demand it as a right is to demand control over what other people notice and remember no one really has the right to demand
1 reply 1 retweet 13 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @sleeperjoebiden and
Like, people are wary of it because it's so obviously fucking abusable and so widely abused It's called "catfishing" these days, in its most extreme form, but it's as old as the Internet and has been pissing people off as long as the Internet's existed
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @sleeperjoebiden and
"This is my account for harassment and racist memes, and this is my account for being a serious political thinker, and this is my account for pretending to be a teenager so other teenagers in this fandom aren't uncomfortable around me"
3 replies 2 retweets 14 likes
"And if you notice me logging into one alt when I think I'm logged into another and tell people, you are violating my human rights"
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @sleeperjoebiden and
Like, sure, yes, I think most people are right to have usernames that are a handle and not a wallet name, that requiring wallet names like Facebook does results in a lot more harm than good, that being addressed the way you want to be addressed is basic etiquette
1 reply 1 retweet 13 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @sleeperjoebiden and
But making it into a rule tat you get to play around with gaming your ability to "control your presentation online" as much as you want and no one can challenge you is asking for trouble I don't have to posit some imaginary worst-case scenario, the result is just 2010 Reddit
2 replies 1 retweet 9 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.