Except that's not true. Some people had to have seen the initial leak. They'd tell other people and it would spread from there. Information spreads like water, just because you didn't encounter this particular stream doesn't mean no one did.
-
-
Replying to @Zendervai @GabrielObray and
and the bit where it literally wasn't a leak bu this name
2 replies 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @davidgerard @Zendervai and
Because everyone deserves the right to write anonymously. That's the key point being debated here, and if the vital bit of personal information doesnt count as a leak, literally nothing does.
5 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GabrielObray @davidgerard and
If someone's name isn't personal information, THEN WHAT FUCKING IS JESUS CHRIST
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GabrielObray @davidgerard and
This is the most Online Brain thing I've seen in a while lately (and I am, in the main, highly sympathetic to the broad argument that our society asks for wallet names way too much)
2 replies 1 retweet 24 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @GabrielObray and
As someone who grew up during the "everyone online is a child pedator trying to trick you" panic, the idea that anonymity is a right and not a personal responsibility is baffling.
1 reply 1 retweet 15 likes -
Replying to @AliceNAmpersand @arthur_affect and
Yeah, really wish the victims of online sexual harassment had been afforded the anonymity they deserve.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GabrielObray @arthur_affect and
The fact that their abusers wouldn't give it to them is exactly the problem. And it is in the Scott case as well!
3 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @GabrielObray @davidgerard and
So, 1) Scott's situation is equivalent to that of children who were groomed online, and 2) Through some kind of galaxy-brained argument, children who were groomed online were harmed by that grooming because they lacked anonymity
1 reply 1 retweet 14 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @GabrielObray and
(Walk me through exactly how you think this works please because the usual story of a child being harmed by online grooming has nothing to do with the child being involuntarily "doxed")
2 replies 1 retweet 15 likes
I guess a better analogy you could use here is that Scott's situation is equivalent to that of someone whose nudes have been shared in an act of revenge porn Which is a great analogy, if you're a turd
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @GabrielObray and
jesus christ i've heard more coherent and plausible arguments from bitcoiners making excuses for proof of work
2 replies 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @davidgerard @arthur_affect and
at least they're only motivated by money
0 replies 0 retweets 6 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.