Right, the indefensible part of the argument isn't arguing whether or not Scott is racist, or whether or not him being racist impacts his ability to provide mental health care It's the part where SCOTT'S PATIENTS CAN'T BE TRUSTED TO MAKE THAT ASSESSMENT THEMSELVES
-
-
There were a lot of people who wanted to be Peter Wiggin though
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Miles Taylor, former DHS chief of staff, outed himself a couple of years after the editorial. Who knows if he could have kept it secret longer, or if he’d have lasted that long with a weekly column? https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/28/us/politics/miles-taylor-anonymous-trump.html …pic.twitter.com/9Ra28jEotT
- Show replies
-
-
-
The biggest successful secret identity story I can think of is Belle du Jour/Brooke Magnanti, but that was back in the 2000s, before Web 2.0 really existed And she still outed herself in '09 because she was sure she was going to be outed involuntarily soon if she didn't
-
And, unlike what Scott was doing, that was actually a *secret* secret, not an "open secret" No one in her life knew she was Belle du Jour but her agent and her lawyer, her own family didn't know
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This made me think of Carles/Hipster Runoff and I ended up reading the long interview he did with Vice and wow. It seems like being pseudonymous is simultaneously liberating and trapping, because it makes you become so conscious that you’re playing a character.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Stephen King got outed because a guy with a hunch was real bored in like 1980
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.